Saturday, March 16, 2013

Winter Reflections




left, a milking barn; center, future hay barn; right, hoop house   

There were many cold days and nights this winter.  It seems that for weeks the only logical chore was to split cordwood for the night's and day's fire. On the few nice days we debarked eight tree trunk sections, 7 foot in length or so, and after cleaning them, painted them with a couple of coats of latex paint, and put them into holes set in concrete, two rows of four timber posts, salvaged deadwood from the Wallow Burn, all douglas fir of about 6 inch diameters -- except for one which is aspen, by mistake.  I assume it prefers to be a fir, like the rest of its cohort in utility.  Those nights were still freezing, so there is a frostbitten, broken layer of concrete around the poles at ground level.  No matter; the holes are deeper than two feet, and filled with strong concrete gravel mix all the way down.

Frostbitten concrete around a pole setting. meh
My friend Laura is an architectural genius; she has pioneered many applications of 1/4" galvanized welded steel cattle fence panels by erecting half-pipe rows of these; resulting in semicircular tunnels of welded mesh, strong enough to resist bending and maintains its strength when bent and held in place. So far she has used this method to construct a hoop house for vegetable gardening, a chicken coop and covered yard, and a goat milking shed and shade barn.  The barn that we have been setting poles for, between snows, will be covered in the same way; and indeed those panels are already in place.  Only lacking the covering layers, the floor, the loft, a few more elements...the work goes on.

Monday, March 4, 2013

Multum in Parvo

Hey I have a blog!  Have had for years, whaddya know.  Life has thankfully changed completely since my first few "posts" here.  What was going on with me when I last posted?  Apparently I was barely functional!  I think I was trying to write a blog in 2007 because I had completely isolated myself from the world, and needed to know that I could still communicate.

But what to say? I had little in mind worth discussing, it seems.

I was at the end of a decade in which I had given up mathematical bohemianism in order to "grow up" and have a significant other relationship in my life and the stability of a career.  All, it seems, for nothing.  No, for less than nothing -- for the opportunity cost of pursuing other options!  I coulda been a no-contender, dammit!  Instead I wasted my savings on a useless degree in Business Management and my time on a few long software development projects.

It is because he does not contend
that he is without reproach.  
-- Lao Tse

My family motto, "Multum in Parvo" translates "Much in Little". Yes, we're a clever lot.  But there is much in me, not that this blog would demonstrate it historically.  My point isn't to prove myself up to the creed of my clan, but simply to say that I feel it as naturally as breathing.  There is much in me; not that I can say anything constructive about what it is or what it means.  I contain galaxies; my experience appears as All in All of Everything, even though I don't understand a mote of it.  I know that's egotistical, and my objective self knows it is solipsistic and false except insofar as it goes -- inside of my own experience.  So does that make sense?  I'm not asking you to validate or believe there is much in me, but just letting you know, that is my experience, a part of my experience.  Part of who I am.

To recap, I am returning to this blog after five years of absence, five years during which I have completely changed my relationship to life, the world, other people, to almost everything.  I will describe those changes and my current mode and direction of life later; but first I am kind of fascinated by the mirror image  of that younger self who made these earlier posts.  He was lost, dazed, confused, depressed, trying half-heartedly to offer something of value to the world, to pay the rent; that man had woken up and found that his life was being swallowed by a psychic sinkhole, had been swallowed by it, had been being swallowed by it.

I am grateful for the ongoing economic collapse in a selfish way, because it confirmed my suspicions that the fish stinks from the head; that my extremely distasteful experience in the corporate world reflected upon the depraved corruption, turpitude, and moral and practical repugnance of the whole organ of international commerce, most significantly in banking and "financial services."  Ha! At least these days, most people will understand what I mean when I say that calling what big banks do for their "clients" by the moniker of a "service" is the most monstrously audacious con that has ever been propagated on the public.

What can I tell you about business?  I have a degree with a very high GPA; I paid some attention.  I can tell you, the status quo is quite broken.  Irremediably broken.  The only question is the form that the denouement will take: war? Huxleyian systems of fascistic control of human worker drones?  Happily, I can finally say that I don't care.  It's coming, it will come, it must come; the only question that applies to me is, what will I do?

Let me just state the case clearly: I am a dissident of the modern order.  I believe we are heading for doom, but also that it is probably inevitable and evolutionary.  Is something dying here, or something being born?  I don't have any idea, but I like the idea of babies.  In general.

Thing is about babies: things can and do go wrong.  A friend with a broody hen related to me this evening the story of how her mother had taken her and her sister into the closet where incubated eggs were hatching under an incandescent bulb.  Mother directed daughters to help a chick out of the egg, picking aside the pieces of shell to assist the chicks emergence.  Such chicks almost always die.  Mother taught in visceral fashion, at the small cost of one egg, the lesson that helping doesn't always help.

I have come to this view of the world. Perhaps something farther beyond our ken than the everlasting question of chicken and egg is being born in us, through our crazy consumptive suffering greed run amok.  Who can say?  I do know that it is best not to peel away the pieces of shell that are seemingly obstructive, but functionally, mechanically, necessary to survival.

The financial crisis was underway five years ago.  Today, it is much worse, and partly it is worse because people have been made to believe that it is better.  Truth is, we seem to be headed for a wall as a global culture.  Seeing this unfold five years ago, I was depressed and paralysed.  I didn't know what to do, but I was tired of being a wage slave.  Computer programming jobs that once sustained my mathematical bohemian lifestyle have long since moved to India or China.  But more than any practical considerations, I was just tapped out and heartsick over the entire culture of money, corporate business, lawlessness, long-term irrationality, of expected greed and self-centeredness.  I refuse to support that world anymore.  I can't say that I am out of it completely, but I am as out of it as I can get. 

Nor do I think anymore in terms of saving the world.  Or helping it.  For one thing, the people running things now are hideous and evil monsters and I want no truck at all with any of them.  For another thing, if something beautiful is poking its beak out of the mire, I don't want it to die, and so I am very hesitant to try to help.

And I am happy with that.

More about that later.



Wednesday, January 16, 2008

And pick up my dry cleaning while you're at it...


My favorite part of this posting on SF Craigslist is the very bottom line. Literally.

Now I'm sure that the author of the post will pay for these services if they can find this individual. But c'mon. You want me to market yet another insipid social networking site AND redesign the page? Get firkin lost, ahole!

Monday, January 14, 2008

HAHAHAHA



OMG, this is funny. "Won't you blog about this song?" Yeah I think I will.

I just heard of TechCrunch a few days ago. Some dude all hyped up about "Web 3.0" -- looking for Rockstars of Web 3.0 no less.

So what is Web 3.0? I asked myself. Then I asked Wiki. She know so much more than I do! Dang, I was better off not knowing about it.

The problem that Web 3.0 is purporting to solve...or to attempt to solve...can be illustrated by Craigslist. I love CL. The last two jobs I've worked on have come from the Gigs section. I check it regularly.

A couple of days ago I was looking for an RSS feed so that I could work with the listings a bit more efficiently. Not very necessary, it was just a thought. But there is no such feed available on CL. So I looked at the source code, and sure enough it would be easy to parse out the HTML results to pull out the listings and their links and do whatever I want with that data. But I would have to do it myself, which wouldn't be big deal since I know what the HTML does and means.

What Web 3.0 supposedly does is standardize the use of tag attributes (if you don't know what that means, just smile and nod and don't ask any questions. You're welcome) so that a computer can search across the Internets and find meaning. Really. So that Craigslist job postings would be recognizable as job postings, not just HTML links, by a machine.

If that sounds like a pipe dream to you, I completely agree. That plan may produce some interesting coding and algorithmic developments, but ... well, the idea of abstracting meaning from metadata is just a load of Metacrap. FWIW...

Dance With Me

I'm the guy along the wall who is scowling at the people on the dance floor. It appears as if I dislike them all quite a lot.

On the contrary, I wish I were more like them. I've had my eye on you for an hour, and I can't quite bring myself to walk over to you take a single step away from the wall. Hey, it's all warm and cozy now.

This is what blogging represents for me. It feels when I begin to dance or make an overture that I am courting rejection of the adolescent-horrific variety. I feel exposed and self-conscious. Maybe that's because that is exactly the domain of blogging: self-exposure and self-consciousness.

Some of this is the result of the shock of surf-by flaming from other denizens of the net. My, but people can be testy! And partly it's that I'm not that social to begin with a complete hermit. I don't care what you think. I don't need you to approve my thoughts.

On the other hand, relationships are important to me, as are your reactions to what I say. And oh, I desperately need your approval.

Sheesh. With this out of the way, maybe I can start to express myself here more. Because if there is a contradiction (I first typoed "contraction" hmmm) in this post, it is one that represents the central challenge of my life.

Hi, let's dance.

Monday, January 7, 2008

What Remains To Be Seen

It is surprising that at this late date in the advance of civilizations that reason should come under such persistent attack from both Religion and Government. It makes one wonder, what constitutes an "advance"?

We have seen what corporations and governments do with computers. We have yet to see what philosophers may do with them. But the fact that they have done so little of popular note with this marvelous tool remains.

Here's a suggestion:

Automated parsing of spoken and written language for modal logic patterns laid out by Aristotle. We are innundated daily by propagandistic manglings of language by sophists with nefarious self-interests in play. But the philosophers have so far not availed us of this necessary tool. My GMail account knows how to parse a conversation well enough to target my conversational topics as advertising keywords. Are you telling me that all those Ph.D.s at Google are not philosophers? Pfeh.

I suspect that the reason lawyers do not appeal to a universally available and long known, even ancient, system of logical argumentation and analysis, is that they all want the leeway to lie and obsfuscate and mislead with fallacy when it next suits them; though they all know logic, they all have tacitly agreed not to use it in an obviously systematic way. This means we must rely on their gamesmanship as much or more than upon their construal of -- our -- arguments. Rather than the sparse rules of logic, we have a truly labyrinthine system of laws that requires their very expensive expertise to negotiate. Funny how that works.

Another obstacle is that modal logic has been one-upped among the academics by propositional logic ("Type Theory"). But it should not have been -- the two systems should not be competing at all, because they deal with different problems. Modal logic deals with human language and thought; Type Theory deals with abstractions useful to mathematicians and scientists. Keep them both, of course -- and use them both where they are needed.

It is the role of the philosopher to step into the void created by corporate-lackey Doctors of Philosophy and the academic camp-followers of the engineering schools. The academics and Ph.D's exclude themselves from being iconoclasts, going along to get along; but when the institutions have all been corrupted by greed or politics or both, iconoclasism is the last refuge of the lover of the vision of the truth; who is, if it needs be said, the only Philosopher worthy of the title. Give me Logic, or give me Bush. Oh, you already did. Gee thanks.

The World's most depressing recipe tag

From the top of my Gmail inbox:
Ginger Spam Salad - Serves 1, refrigerate overnight



Powered by ScribeFire.